taken
load
constrained
rigid
shown
46158
substituting
elasticity
interesting
estimate
iered
irmation
excitation
appropriate
density
source
1ie'
minimized
U5
show
quantify
a4uliiz4
even
a3u3
involve
7929
9197
sting
FREE
46607
etc
SHIFT
primarily
APPENDIX
compromise
substantial
choosing
INTERCONNECTED
wa
set
2'8019
missile
128
bring
lid
both
1946'
tt1o
prior
mainly
interconnected
9954
6748
significantly
maximization
nodal
denoted
simulation
resifonse
third
ROD
47711
SUPPORT
clamped
academic
approach
self
absence
aii
closely
transcendental
higher
pjaj
OO8
31374
lireg
dynamic
area
equation
frec
aerodynamic
stiffnes
modelling
exist
INTRODUCTION
azj
necessary
natural
four
introduce
investigated
affected
individual
simple
differentiation
FORMULATION
ELASTICALLY
commonly
expected
pre
a2u2
bangalore
many
UI
numerical
considerably
tperl
act
way
129
U4
124
predominating
42059
LOCATION
presented
symposium
2remain
ovld
combination
axial
parameter
away
MODEL
investigate
unsteady
increase
joshi
fei
imerference
tiui1s
frjee
rod
possible
6512
length
oscillating
understand
resemble
under
frequencie
azi
earlier
differential
2022
7758
determined
KJ
launchvehicle
motion
angle
comribution
0751
end
theory
74068
satisfy
m11
particular
than
Z3
8414
POINTS
reduction
technology
siiffnes
follow
stra
zero
aeroelastic
ncie
resistance
modelof
practice
order
following
gust
anq
vibration
difference
sure
strongly
respectively
1968the
conclusion
2A096
actual
m33
flexural
generally
changed
'1j
stiffnesse
RESULTS
IN
characteristic
2499
2096
ojfe5t
trend
9027
any
SOLUTION
more
a2u
september
most
'od
6364
2526
slender
hat
onjunction
measurement
cantilevered
again
relevant
'''''
much
part
flight
assessing
fact
seen
only
l'o
structural
JOSH
aul
119
strong
OF
approache
INERTIA
into
seven
good
poao
dependent
solved
translational
junction
avoidsimultaneousexcitation
probably
0022
increasing
1436
come
loj
l22
paper
uniform
almost
vibrationbulletin
value
contain
displacement
twelve
f'jt
icientify
negligible
L4
august
llx
leaving
46765
some
function
EFFECTS
REFERENCES
constant
respect
non
uffet
location
launching
pav
inside
likely
negligibly
aeroelastically
elastic
steady
necessarily
variation
substitution
IV
shift
mind
Z1
bending
41985
fohow
studying
know
5vpport
behaviour
variou
lower
aracteristic
specific
LJPADHYA
deflection
design
studie
ideally
other
term
AHS
turbulence
another
understandaable
view
125
VARIOUS
normalized
r1f1
launch
arameter
4659
stres
BOUNDARYCONDITIONS
1986
orthe
broken
ivei1
choice
inadequate
well
potential
concentrated
EJ
slructure
en'
stif
governing
48079
pres
JOSHI
beam
figure9
decide
indicating
suitable
5860
dayton
mii
JONES
deciding
118
form
give
ijl
equilibrium
figure
node
being
NUMERICAL
preset
may
36719
different
stiffer
shqck
thu
examination
marginal
number
CHEN
error
now
16971
produce
proved
identical
their
scale
best
aeaod
therefore
55239
pressure
far
suffix
also
sound
related
but
too
over
largely
induce
ooe
assume
correspond
matrix
subjected
include
ha
126
tl1ere
ordinate
'2r
coming
based
alizing
greater
tbe
such
shape
unaffected
vce
A7
example
discussed
iizl
turbulent
time
cylindrical
quantitie
shortly
comparatively
geometry
55589
prone
coupling
idealized
complex
trivial
represent
871
achieve
nertia
separation
gradual
meter
HANSON1963
useful
alter
E1
use
secl2
excepting
encie
suitably
conference
mentioned
typical
3'1576
appropriately
observed
buffeting
mean
kit
simultaneou
significantamount
rlu2
iusion
range
lriao
dictated
effect
fizdui
BEA
absent
merge
127
3'9990
ljpadhya
constraint
eolo
practical
a2u3
reduce
studied
iflatiog
presence
type
note
nature
supported
there
keeping
signified
certain
ST1FFNESS
directly
amount
arising
CONCLUSIONS
136
116
few
pjo
reverse
should
a'nd
predominantly
applying
arriving
KI
mention
2108
KL
resulting
n4ghgible
coefficient
index
198324th
eocrgy
known
aimed
fi1i
mjj
line
similarity
result
solution
adversely
detail
dominantly
need
tl'i
a2i
bserved
interaction
vpled
indicated
006
although
STIFFNESSES
important
iteot
comparison
all
j1t1y
transverse
practically
total
support
inertia
itself
content
pled
marginallyaffected
continuity
altered
closenes
2059
prototype
revised
airflow
specify
isvalue
appendix
buffet
curvature
significant
liate
987
jijl
VJ
46748m22
attributed
designed
predict
arrive
coincide
ljaj
c27
slope
fairly
traint
117
contributing
homogeneou
AIAA
sinh
460X
satisfied
ajzj
sufficientseparation
consisting
160115
stifines
COUPLING
substantially
ml1
reasonably
moment
energy
system
ohio
3494
intermediate
shifting
bly
model
static
national
'get
ith
upport
explain
560017
similarly
gly
study
affect
unchanged
case
slight
observation
contradiction
1963
1987
cartesian
OO6
008
6168
predominanuy
a2ui
realm
representing
yield
dimensionalization
formulation
evident
examine
guideline
nodel
48815
rocket
large
couple
freq
relatively
KI'
attempt
boundary
deformation
force
EFFECT
become
phenomenon
deform
ia2u
ent
eilf
consideration
rodmode
propertie
operator
resuit
comparable
might
tend
49756
iittle
vpport
corresponding
SDM
shear
TITAN
second
october
cros
cou
whether
noticeabiy
three
LIN
reference
prediction
saturn
two
arbitrary
each
damping
frequenciesin
nomenclature
unaltered
it
weight
full
excited
121
close
limit
A4
block
however
testing
LJ
determinant
ZI
one
minimum
restraint
laboratory
considered
42097
tel
UPADHYA
perhap
direction
wind
will
lce
A1
cause
quite
very
K1
problem
avoid
m22
component
percent
exactly
thereby
lix
dimensionles
bringing
journal
till
nes
then
ger
pa1sf
segment
BEAMS
dovm
a3u
interference
iso
connected
elementary
1622
predominantlysecondsupport
pport
increased
six
spacecraft
tjx
0'2
NASA
3534
differentiate
similar
VIBRATION
pajm
indicate
same
free
L0
HANSON
L2L
optimum
erroneou
ofthe
here
EIJ
raised
given
ensure
yet
analysi
separate
rewritten
130
krlo
ASME
offset
between
MODAL
6786
though
m22i
attack
influenced
atmospheric
trial
offer
doe
pattern
fully
modal
determination
115
dividuaj
lof
body
path
dimension
ing
ndia
122
normally
AV
fourth
CONDITIONS
33691
clearly
45458
written
limited
dimensio'nles
AJ
versu
obtained
6138
response
because
condition
0928
configuration
level
'f1tat
vehicle
coupled
cantilever
NOMENCLATURE
recalled
DOGGE
harmonic
done
frequency
sectional
spring
JJ
minima
idea
ASCE
40688
decrease
slightly
experimental
equal
II
U3
L1
used
7460
true
mji
when
ground
reached
reveal
solid
mode
aeronautical
base
jth
change
amoun
influence
A2
freqeuncy
rotational
JI
elastically
superscript
tated
unknown
adjusted
denote
point
hand
performance
flow
6763
small
found
7158
UCHIYAMA
masse
achieving
DOGGETJR
low
pure
through
while
theoretical
fluctuation
minimize
impossible
suffixj
linear
generalized
Z2
simplified
finally
JUNCTION
8416
PETERS
50915
mil
purpose
1965
present
see
cosh
2713
co
pose
eijm
JR
TN
common
difficultie
either
l1x
noticeably
e2ii
mas
general
maximum
receiued
flexible
five
closer
list
out
to'
stage
consist
EI
tunnel
en
balance
scaled
ergy
at2
conjunction
lily
manifest
11one
contribution
sin
lessthe
ictua
around
avoided
along
not
ijzih
remain
circular
division
drop
123
reduced
remained
pair
high
first
overall
stilfnes'
structure